Could someone please..

[Impaler]

Could some please send me the file: boinc_5.4.11_windows_intelx86.exe compressed into a .zip file or something?

GateKeeper sent it to me but MSN thinks its a virus when it comes in a .exe file...Thx!

Let kick some ass!!

Greets Impaler:bonedemon:

[velociraptor]

hi impaler

aren´t you able to download it from:

http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download.php

if not tell me how to send it to you.......

then i´ll try to
have a nice day,
vel

[Impaler]

Thx..but I don't think it's the same file...?

[velociraptor]

i downloaded it from this link and it says:

boinc_5.4.11_windows_intelx86.exe

isn´t this your version????

[Lagu]

Did you mean an optimized one?

[Impaler]

Lagu: yes please

[Lagu]

Impaler

Check your inbox:icon_wink:

[velociraptor]

sorry, but which way of optimized client do you mean????

[Impaler]

Thx alot!! Got it..

[Lagu]

I have 5.4.11. If your computer use SSE2 you should shooce this variant. When you have unzipped it and run the installation process you the will have
this: 2006-10-14 02:04:28||Starting BOINC client version 5.5.0 for windows_intelx86
2006-10-14 02:04:28||libcurl/7.15.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8a zlib/1.2.3

Your Boinc-version is still 5.4.11 yet.
If you not have 5.11.4 you can open a project and download this Client from there.

[Lagu]

Glad I could be to help:)

[Impaler]

15.10.2006 21:20:36||Starting BOINC client version 5.5.0 for windows_intelx86
15.10.2006 21:20:36||libcurl/7.15.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8a zlib/1.2.3
15.10.2006 21:20:36||Data directory: E:\Program Files\BOINC
15.10.2006 21:20:36||Processor: 2 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
15.10.2006 21:20:36||Memory: 1023.48 MB physical, 2.40 GB virtual
15.10.2006 21:20:36||Disk: 69.23 GB total, 55.12 GB free
15.10.2006 21:20:36||Version change (5.4.11 -> 5.5.0); running CPU benchmarks
15.10.2006 21:20:36|Project TANPAKU|URL: http://issofty17.is.noda.tus.ac.jp/; Computer ID: 8488; location: ; project prefs: default
15.10.2006 21:20:36||No general preferences found - using BOINC defaults
15.10.2006 21:20:36||Local control only allowed
15.10.2006 21:20:36||Listening on port 31416
15.10.2006 21:20:36||Suspending network activity - running CPU benchmarks
15.10.2006 21:20:38||Running CPU benchmarks
15.10.2006 21:20:51||Resuming network activity
15.10.2006 21:20:51|Project TANPAKU|Sending scheduler request to http://issofty17.is.noda.tus.ac.jp/cgi/cgi
15.10.2006 21:20:51|Project TANPAKU|Reason: Requested by user
15.10.2006 21:20:51|Project TANPAKU|(not requesting new work or reporting completed tasks)
15.10.2006 21:21:02|Project TANPAKU|Scheduler request succeeded
15.10.2006 21:21:37||Benchmark results:
15.10.2006 21:21:37|| Number of CPUs: 2
15.10.2006 21:21:37|| 3401 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
15.10.2006 21:21:37|| 11217 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
15.10.2006 21:21:37||Finished CPU benchmarks
15.10.2006 21:21:38|Project TANPAKU|Resuming task pep3_192_9_24_1_1 using BD version 504
15.10.2006 21:21:38|Project TANPAKU|Resuming task pep3_171_9_10_1_2 using BD version 504
15.10.2006 21:21:38||Resuming computation
15.10.2006 21:21:38||Rescheduling CPU: Resuming computation


Does it look ok?

Greetz

[gamer007]

Looks fine. I'm assuming you are using Crunch3r's by the looks of the benchmarks.

Now all you need to do is change your "Get Work Every..." to .001 in the General Preferences options so you only get 1 WU at a time meaning when you return it, you'll get the credits you claim. This is because of how TANPAKU manages their credit system. 1st result in WU returned = the credits granted for the whole WU.

[Lagu]

Yes, Impaler, It´s Ok. Run Benchmark and watch the results.

[Evil-Dragon]

Some projects are banning 5.5.0 due to it causing arguements over overclaiming credit. I stopped using it a long time ago and i am now using 5.4.11 (switching to 5.6.5 when i have finished doing climate modelling)

[dracula bernstein]

you gus are nerds. iam in alabama.:angry7: what are you talking about? who are you as a person?.

[NeoGen]

Bernstein, I give the benefit of the doutb, maybe it's the fact that in written things can get the meaning distorted, but your post doesn't sound friendly.
Please don't forget your manners, as we are all human beings too behind the keyboards.

Now would you care to explain your previous post better, please?

[Steve Lux]

Bernstein;

Interesting first post. Insults, typographical errors, grammatical errors, punctuation errors, capitalization errors, even word spacing errors. All in so few words. Perhaps someone should be a bit more of a "nerd", at least then there would be the possibility of intelligence.

(Editing out the meaner comments)

Nice job representing the Alabama educational system. http://www.morganquitno.com/edrank.htm

[gatekeeper53]

Neo,

He did explain the post. He's from Alabama the home of the 37 year old third graders.