Is OGR-25 really over?

[NeoGen]

It shows 100% completed, but has the following note below:

"This data is from 2004-05-10. Note that this is only for stubs with leading marks totalling less than 70."

[numibesi]

I guess not but i found this:

"...distributed.net will end "OGR Classic" and begin "OGRp2" (OGR Phase 2) in the next week or two. OGRp2 will search the small stubs left over from the OGR Classic stub search-space. New clients (version 2.9008-490) and proxies (build 341) will be available (and required) for OGRp2. Prerelease versions of the new client and proxy are available for r testing as of yesterday..."

[vaughan]

DMMC how are you still getting your OGR results accepted? When I ran it for a day and tried to flush the work I got a message that the project was closed, units rejected. Then it switched to RC5-72 automatically.

[AMDave]

vaughan

OGRp2 is being called phase II of the OGR-25 project
so Im guessing that is why the "P2" results are being accepted and logged under the OGR-25 stats.
I am guessing that your project list in config may not contain OGRP2 yet, still only the old "OGR" entry
In my config I have closed the "OGR" project by setting it to "OGR=0"
now the OGRP2 project is streaming Wus and results instead

Oh. PS - I also re-downloaded the client before doing this.

[Ototero]

And doing alright in the stats as well :D

[vaughan]

Thanks Dave, yes my Dnet client was old. It didn't have the P2 version. Now back to chasing you in RC5-72. :shock:

[Beerknurd]

I never ran D-Net.... So many projects... Not enough computers....

[Empty_5oul]

me, neither beerknurd.
i am still waiting on their conformation e-mial lol, i need to e-mail them really saying i cant sign up

[Beerknurd]

I emailed Chessbrain with the same problem.... I guess they don't want new members....

[Empty_5oul]

yep :(

ototero's got it down perfectly now tho in chessbrain, with us having a section of the stats under V tho we dont actually have an account.

[Ototero]

it's so much frigging around.....



But I'm here to serve. :P

[Empty_5oul]

your doing a great job and i think everyone is now perfectly happy with it, so no ammendments

the major thing i would like is too see team wise who is next above and below us + their current production rates and scores. i dont know how it would be possible to define 1 team above AMD Users, so as we move up/down the rankings it would change itself. dont worry for the moment i am pleased with what we have.

[vaughan]

Stats are great Stu. Thanks.