PDA

View Full Version : footsteps ototero


BoostedIntegra
10-30-2004, 03:35 AM
i expect a challenge
Beerknurd
10-30-2004, 12:05 PM
I don't think he has that kind of power..... :lol:
Ototero
10-30-2004, 12:10 PM
Hey Boosted,

You'll get me later today or maybe tomorrow. I have only 1 machine on it.

At least I'm in front of Beerknurd ;)
BoostedIntegra
10-30-2004, 03:52 PM
10m
Ototero
10-30-2004, 05:46 PM
Whhhoooooooo
Beerknurd
10-30-2004, 06:21 PM
I'll catch you eventually..... When you least expect it..... :twisted:
Empty_5oul
10-30-2004, 07:00 PM
boosted how many machines you got then ?
firepower like that is awesome, especially since you are doing d2ol aswell.
BoostedIntegra
10-30-2004, 09:18 PM
i have 1 computer a 2.4ghz celeron running sob
Beerknurd
10-30-2004, 09:29 PM
i have 1 computer a 2.4ghz celeron running sob

1 Computer..... And your running at 18M..... How do you figure that???

http://www.seventeenorbust.com/stats/users/user.mhtml?userID=5479
BoostedIntegra
10-30-2004, 10:01 PM
i oc'd it to 2.5, i have 128mb ram, its crazy fast, lol
Beerknurd
10-30-2004, 10:05 PM
I have a 3.4 and can only get a little over 2M. I don't see how 18M is possible with a 2.4.
Empty_5oul
10-30-2004, 10:08 PM
me. neither beerknurd.

2 meg from one machine seems to be the mazimum currently possible unless you spend mage money on brand new processors.
you wouldnt get 18M from 1 machine, seems either the stats are gone wrong or something else is up ?.
Empty_5oul
10-30-2004, 10:08 PM
me neither beerknurd.

2 meg from one machine seems to be the mazimum currently possible unless you spend mage money on brand new processors.
you wouldnt get 18M from 1 machine, seems either the stats are gone wrong or something else is up ?.
BoostedIntegra
10-30-2004, 10:32 PM
a celeron couldn't find itself out of a paper bag let alone do 18m i have multiple comps running it.
Beerknurd
10-30-2004, 10:42 PM
Ok, cause I was scratching my head over that one... :lol: :scratch:
Empty_5oul
10-30-2004, 10:43 PM
thats why i asked:


boosted how many machines you got then ?
Beerknurd
10-30-2004, 11:10 PM
At least 9.......
Empty_5oul
10-30-2004, 11:35 PM
yep, i would have thiught so.

all sweet tho providing some massive boosts that we need right now to pull away from BeOS
BoostedIntegra
10-30-2004, 11:55 PM
i still think its funny that I'm not running a single AMD processor and I'm on this team.
Empty_5oul
10-31-2004, 12:11 AM
what made you pick this team then boosted if you dont have an AMD ????
BoostedIntegra
10-31-2004, 01:46 AM
i knew jeff in high school and he told me about DC and I joined not knowing any better and I don't really care where the stats go its just a chance to talk s^%# and show people that the P4 is wonderful and amazing.
AMDave
10-31-2004, 01:56 AM
lol
and we are happy you bring them Mike.
Beerknurd
10-31-2004, 02:03 AM
Boosted....

I don't own an AMD either!!!! See guys, I'm not the only one!!!
BoostedIntegra
10-31-2004, 02:12 AM
God has a special place for you and I beerknurd. :D :evil:
Beerknurd
10-31-2004, 03:17 AM
I agree.... I think Intel kicks ass. But I have nothing to compare it to. I have personally never used an AMD. But I hear they are nice. :lol:
BoostedIntegra
10-31-2004, 02:49 PM
i had a 3200+Athlon 64. It was ok, but the lack of dual channel support kind of turned me off. I'm sure the guy I sold it to is enjoying it, but I will never buy another AMD processor. EM64T will dominate!!!
jlangner
10-31-2004, 05:31 PM
I have about 50/50 AMD/Intel. Top is an A64 3500. It does have the dual channel though.
Beerknurd
11-01-2004, 01:31 AM
So what's the best AMD on the market right now??

Let's say compared to a 3.6 ghz Intel...... And does AMD have "Hyper Threading" capabilities yet?? I know it wouldn't be called Hyper Threading on an AMD.... But doe they offer that yet?????
jlangner
11-01-2004, 02:24 AM
They have Hyper Transport I think. As far as 3.6 Intel, A AMD 64 3800, FX53, FX55 will blow one away in "most" cases, particularly gaming.
Beerknurd
11-01-2004, 03:31 AM
What does a system like that cost??
BoostedIntegra
11-01-2004, 05:20 AM
If you want top performance today it would be an Extreme Edition P4. In 32bit apps the Extreme wastes the fx series AMD's. 64bit different story but I said "today" save your money and wait for Intel's new CPU's with 64bit extensions and Intel will again be on top. Price shouldn't be a huge issue as the new design gets more cuts out of a sheet of silicon. It will be a back and forth topic... But Intel has more resources and funding behind them, so if they want they can always win.
Empty_5oul
11-01-2004, 08:21 AM
here is some benchmarking between the two

http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040201/

go to "benchmark results" to see the nice graph comparisions.

intel seems to do better overall, but the numbers are often very close right up at the top.
AMDave
11-01-2004, 09:41 AM
apparently there are 2 CISC instruction set commands missing from the Intel implementation of 64-bit.

this was raised in last months APC-Mag review.

in the same article AMD denied assisting Intel with the engineering of their combatant to the AMD-64.

it was alledged that Intel had based their 64-bit implementation on an "early" model AMD-64 and might in fact have "missed the boat" on this one.

time will tell. evidence is as yet scarce.

Intel have already cancelled their scheduled 4.0Ghz P4.
They said it was not going to happen.
They have moved their resources into their multi-Core project instead.

The future will have a lot less to do with 64 bit addressing and a lot more to do with how many CPU cores you can fit on a silicon die.

Look for single chip implementations of SIMD & MIMD architectures coming to a desktop near you....

The next "slugfest" in CPU land is going to be VERY interesting indeed.

(I've been looking into blade servers recently = EXPENSIVE !
regardless...I still want my dual/quaq opteron box....drool)