On Dnet I guided myself for that little line near the top that says the data reflects all blocks received until xx/xx/xx 23:59. I waited until seeing there 21/03/2005.
Printable View
On Dnet I guided myself for that little line near the top that says the data reflects all blocks received until xx/xx/xx 23:59. I waited until seeing there 21/03/2005.
I have found that after the date changes at the top of the page it still has not finished updating the data in the "Overall" summary page. The indicator for this is that there is a rank change (for an active member) but the WU count on the right has not yet updated. This gets muddied a little when an ex-member of the team is crunching for another team, their rank changes but their WU count for the old team does not. So you need to know who has left the team and who is current. The only way to be sure of that is after all of the updates have finished. LOL.
oh man... I'll pretend I didn't read all that and continue in ignorance... :P :lol:
By the way... You have been posting alot in the last few hours... are you by any chance making a posting spree to reach Post Whore quicker? :lol:
only 5 to go... ;)
Around what time GMT are you usually gonna update the stats?Quote:
Originally Posted by NeoGen
are AMD's better at DNET??? How the hell is bwhite and damn near everyone else geting so much. I have dnet running on 2 computers and only had 24 blocks??? Does that seem right?? That's the only thing i'm crunching. Well not the only thing.... But the only thing using my resources.... (ex. dimes, whatpulse, and tkc).
around 01:00 GMT... hopefully by that hour all DNet stats will be updated...
I think I've seen somewhere that AMD's are better indeed beerknurd, but your stats are most likely behind schedule on the updating part... give it another day and lets see...
EDIT:
Question: do you let the client make the connections and updates alone or do you flush the results manually? when I run it I always do it manually every night before the stats are updated, and they always show up on the tables in time.
Ahhh. Now I see the problem.
The default config is for the Dnet client to run both RC5-72 AND OGR-P2, in that order.
So 1st it runs out of the RC5-72 cache, and then starts on the OGR-P2 WU's. But it will not send an upload until both caches are done. The default cache size is 24 WUs per project (24 OGR-P2 WUs can take a while)
Beer, if you want to run only 1 or the other you will need to change the config:
2) Buffer and Buffer Update Options
9) Load-work precedence ==> RC5-72,OGR-P2=0
I have set my OGR-P2 to off by adding the "=0" after it. If I wanted to run only that I would put
RC5-72=0,OGR-P2
BTW - You did not see your OGR-P2 wu's counting because you need to "join" the team in that project as well (see earlier post)
To see you OGR-P2 output, clcik on your name in the RC5-72 results
That will take you to your individual summary page.
At the bottom of the page there is a list project links
click on the right-most link "OGR-25"
I see that you have done 86 Gnodes yesterday.
AMDs do out-perform the Intels Ghz for Ghz in Dnet
There is an optimised client for the AMD-64 platform, here
http://www.distributed.net/download/prerelease.php
(I think some of our members have tried it/run it)
But, as many will tell you, the Apple-Dual-G5s just "scream" at this stuff.
Oh, and as for bwhite, I think he's using a cray (ssshhhh).
Nah. Just kidding.
You'll see bwhite at the top of several of our projects with some phenomenal scores. He's got a couple more PCs than you or me.
Hope that helps.
Not really. I was just enjoying posting really fast on my new broadband connection.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeoGen
:shock: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I submitted all my results in DNET and went back to SOB. It's what my PC does best....
Sounds fair to me.
Darn it, tho. My old boxes can't keep up with your Prescott in SoB. I'll have to re-think my plan...
Mail-order: 1 x ACME(tm) "Master Plan", please
:lol: