Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 3DMark results

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    5,662

    3DMark results

    We had a thread somewhere but I couldn't find it where some members posted their computer's results in the 3DMark tests.

    Here is mine:

    AMD Athlon xp3200+, running at stock 2.2GHz, WinXP Pro SP2, 1GB DDR400 RAM (Nanya CL3), Seagate ST380021a 80GB SATA HDD, GF3 Ti500 graphics card, Gigabyte NForce 2 GA-7N400 Pro2 motherboard.

    3dMark05: Failed to run as graphics card cannot meet requirements

    3dMark03: 1199


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sundsvall, Sweden
    Posts
    3,532
    Hello

    This is my results:

    I ran both with standard settings because I couldn’t change or select any settings and the processor was idle.

    3DMark 03 2.835 Scores (Perfect, no problems)
    3DMark 05 1.245 Scores (Hard for the graphic card, picture a little jerky).

    AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (NewCastle), 2.247 MHz, Win XP Home Sp2, 1 GB DDR 400 PC 3200 (Kingston), Maxtor 80 GB Sata 7.200 Rpm HDD, ATI Radeon 9600 Pro GeXube Graphic card, Abit Uguru VIA K8T800 Pro/8237 2000 GHz System bus, 1 GHz HT motherboard, Monitor: Hyundai L70N, Resolution 1024 x 768 pixels.

    Vaughan, should you wish to change to ATI? ;)

    Lagu
    Once an AMDuser always an AMD user

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,734
    remember 3D mark is geared towards ATI though, they always score better.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,524
    Ive read that too. Most benchmark programs always seemed to be geared towards Intel.
    Computer Repair in Clarksville, TN
    http://ClarksvillePCRepair.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •