Threadripper 1000 series not THAT affected by Dual Channel?

[plonk420]

so i'm not sure there's a HUGE difference with dual channel vs quad channel with Threadripper (1950X). difference, yes, seemingly, but not that huge...

03/01/2019  0:016:00:54:03  135,385  128
02/28/2019  0:015:18:53:17  133,757  128
02/27/2019  0:015:19:09:27  132,921  128 
02/26/2019  0:015:03:57:05  121,222  117 
02/25/2019  0:016:03:13:15  124,831  120 
02/24/2019  0:016:00:53:07  119,034  115 
02/23/2019  0:009:16:57:20  56,440    62 
02/22/2019  0:007:01:25:18  34,161    34

(2/23 was when i got it) 2/26 was the day i switched from DC to QC. and i have another half day or two to run for good measure (had a fair bit of down time between reboots and for some other reason). but it wasn't the half or other greatly reduced amount i was expecting.

one thing holding me back is that i'm running 16 instances because i ran out of memory at 32 instances of WCG so that's ONE thing making this comparison a bit lopsided, but i got tired of trying to browse the internet on 8GB shared with 16 WCG units. also having issues cooling it at max all core turbo speeds, so i'm locking it to 3.4ghz to keep at least SOMETHING more consistent.

anyone else noticed anything similar? or any projects that are MORE affected by Quad Channel's extra BW?

edit: added today's (2/28) points
edit2: added the next day's points