Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Venice core or SanDiego core?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,524

    Venice core or SanDiego core?

    I am wondering if I should get the 3800+ Venice core or the 3700+ San Diego Core.

    The San Diego core has a 1mb l2 cache, but the Venice has a 200mhz clock advantage.



    SanDiego Specs:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103539
    Venice Specs:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103530
    Computer Repair in Clarksville, TN
    http://ClarksvillePCRepair.com

  2. #2
    go with the sandiego, if you have good memory you could just simply oc it up to the 3800. san diego's are better overclockers too.

  3. #3
    AMDave's Avatar
    AMDave is offline Seeker of the exit clause Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Deep in a while loop
    Posts
    9,658
    :!: All hail the on-die cache :!:

    My recent experience with differences in cache sizes at work has been both telling and (grrr) very trying.

    If the machine is going to do anything repetative at the low level like calculations or database transactions then you want as much cache as you can get. Otherwise if you are looking at streaming media or manipulating big images then you want faster Hz and more RAM. Of course the ideal is a huge cache and lots of RAM.

    In DC terms, I'd go the large on-die cache and speed things up by adding more RAM as required every time.

    I found a great deal of frustration in a machine with lots of RAM and a fast CPU but minimal cache, recently. Although outside of my control, it was an experience that I do not intend to repeat if I can help it.
    . . . . . ___
    . . . . . . .\___/\______
    . . . . . . . \__AMD___\\__
    ---------------------------------------------

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,524
    I will have 1 gig of dual channel memory.

    I think I will go with the SanDiego.

    I can't decide if I want to do SLI or not
    Computer Repair in Clarksville, TN
    http://ClarksvillePCRepair.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    5,662
    SLI is expensive and ONLY helps the games that are optimized to use it. There is a list at nvidia somewhere.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,734
    rather defeats the point of SLI but you could get 1 for the moment and see what the graphics performance is like.
    What games do you play (or will play) i can't imagine you would need really amazing graphics power?

    THen if in a few months you need extra power for games get another and connect them together.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    5,662

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,524
    I think I will be playing Half-Life 2
    Computer Repair in Clarksville, TN
    http://ClarksvillePCRepair.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,524

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,734
    looking at the timings OCZ is much more agressive. depends what you plan on doing, the other is just as good for normal use. But for overclocking you would want the lower timings.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •