Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Anyone near 3:232:11?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    5,644

    Anyone near 3:232:11?

    I got probed twice by 3:232:11 on my planets at 2:79:10 and 3:67:6 (where I launched a probe from to see who he was snooping on me across the Universe).
    He is from team PSA ranked 109th (we are 63rd) and he is korisko (ranked 874th) from planet Ateh. I'm ranked 831st).

    He has 50 BS and 30 Cruisers. Fair amount of ground defence, 40+ IC & GC and 1 PC.

    I'm trying to acquire the resources to research Hyperspace Engine Level 6 so I'm vulnerable to attack at the moment (M=871,000 and C=322,000 and D=536,000) so the last thing I need is spions!


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,734
    i have mentioned to a few people before but:

    now we are more established would it not be worth the slightly higher ranked members helping those below them. As an example take the mines, the majority of us are now breaking into the 20's and they are expensive. So if say I (being ranked 6th) was going for a level 23 solar plant it would take a while for me to amass resources (i could also be raided as i got close - Vaughans problem) so the players above me could give x amount each so i could build it.
    Right now as we are a little spread out this would be of no benefit to the top players as they would constantly be gifting resources- but would help the alliance as a whole. In the future i think where we are all about the same points (due to helping out) as the top players gift small amounts resources each it adds up (20k each from 5 makes 100k) and hopefully the lower ranked plyer will rise above the gifting player from this sudden gain of resources. So as the now lower ranked player wants to build whatever everyone else can gift to him. So it would work in a cycle but minimise what you had to produce and store yourself ensuring across the alliance we were all equal (ish) and no-one was storing too much to be raided and/or fleet crashed.

    i read this through twice and now think (hope) it makes sense.
    What do people think?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    5,644
    Team work.


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    480
    If you see me on, pm me what your still lacking to get your hyperspace completed.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    480
    And that goes for anybody else...."I scratch your back, you scratch mine"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    5,644
    Thanks chaz. I opted for Computer Technology level 10 and 14 Battle Ships instead. I was maxed out with my fleets and they weren't due home for more than an hour. It was already 1am and Lisa was getting sh*tty. Instead of risking all those resources I opted to use them up.

    Maybe hyperspace next time.


  7. #7
    AMDave's Avatar
    AMDave is offline Seeker of the exit clause Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Deep in a while loop
    Posts
    9,612

    mission "BOOSTER" - WAVE I

    mission "BOOSTER" - WAVE I commenced:

    Doomeva
    100K m 100K c (as arraged) eta 3 1/2 hrs

    DMMc
    400K m 200K c 135K d eta 11 1/2 hrs

    Empty_5oul
    400K m 200K c 135K d eta 9 hrs

    you both went offline before I finished arrangements - so I split the total - half each.

    Vaughan
    250K c as discussed eta 3hrs 40 mins (+ some metal)

    Chaz & spjeff you will be next in WAVE II - when my new cargos are ready and my fleet slots are free again.

    I have not seen Nathaniel or gamer007 or ahab active for some time. (probably because I have not been logged in much)
    Has anyone seen them on-line recently ?
    . . . . . ___
    . . . . . . .\___/\______
    . . . . . . . \__AMD___\\__
    ---------------------------------------------

  8. #8
    AMDave's Avatar
    AMDave is offline Seeker of the exit clause Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Deep in a while loop
    Posts
    9,612
    Fleets (max. 11)
    Id Mission Number Start Sending Time Target ETA Order
    1 transport (f) 3 [1:458:9] Sun Aug 14 8:12:42 [2:381:5] Sun Aug 14 11:51:24
    2 transport (f) 3 [1:458:11] Sun Aug 14 8:13:21 [2:381:5] Sun Aug 14 11:52:03
    3 transport (f) 3 [1:458:10] Sun Aug 14 8:17:23 [2:381:5] Sun Aug 14 11:56:05
    4 transport (f) 7 [1:458:9] Sun Aug 14 10:27:46 [2:79:10] Sun Aug 14 14:06:28
    5 transport (f) 3 [1:458:11] Sun Aug 14 10:29:54 [2:79:10] Sun Aug 14 14:08:36
    6 transport (f) 2 [1:458:9] Sun Aug 14 10:34:13 [2:79:10] Sun Aug 14 14:12:55
    7 transport (f) 1 [1:458:10] Sun Aug 14 10:35:12 [2:79:10] Sun Aug 14 14:13:54
    8 transport (f) 3 [1:468:5] Sun Aug 14 10:36:20 [2:79:10] Sun Aug 14 14:15:02
    9 transport (f) 1 [1:468:5] Sun Aug 14 10:54:08 [2:79:10] Sun Aug 14 14:32:50
    10 transport (f) 254 [1:468:7] Sun Aug 14 8:26:22 [3:141:10] Sun Aug 14 18:25:01
    11 transport (f) 248 [1:468:7] Sun Aug 14 8:27:55 [4:257:8] Sun Aug 14 20:41:05
    Maximum number of fleets!
    . . . . . ___
    . . . . . . .\___/\______
    . . . . . . . \__AMD___\\__
    ---------------------------------------------

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,734
    thanks dave that is great.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    480
    I dont need the resources. I am strictly farming and constructing buildings with no fleet other than cargoes and recyclers atm.
    When I can ward off 850 BS then i will begin another fleet.
    I'd rather help out the others at this time. Trying to get more members, but everyone I know is more into FPS than this type of game

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •