Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Optimize Windows?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    87

    Optimize Windows?

    I'd like to get the opinion of those that run Boinc here.

    Optimized Windows Boinc- fair or not?

    I'm just wanting your opinion.

  2. #2
    Yes, it is fair

    If you run Linux, Optimized it is the only way to run. Unless you like getting 50% less credit than windows.
    If pro is opposite of con, then what is the opposite of progress?
    Congress!



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    87
    I didn't say Linux. I said Windows.

    I agree with running Linux optimized. It corrects an bug.

    I'm asking because it seems unfair to me , for someone to inflate the benchmark in Windows and get 3 times the credit, same as under-value-ing the bench in Linux gives you 50% of what Windows gets.

    I'm not going to run Boinc if it's not on an even playing field.

  4. #4
    NeoGen's Avatar
    NeoGen is offline AMD Users Alchemist Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Little Rock, AR (USA)
    Posts
    8,451
    Yea, optimized is the way to go, especially on projects where WYCIWYG (What-You-Claim-Is-What-You-Get)

    All is fair in Love and Distributed Computing!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    St. Joseph, MO
    Posts
    535
    From everything I have read about it the optimized version is fair and it is the regular version that is screwing you out of points since it doesn't take advantage of your chips features. Be like saying your car should drive with two flat tires in a race designed for motorcycles.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    388
    i just modified/hacked DNET so i'm really pulling in the points now,almost double. next i'm going to modify SOB and try F@H as well. is that fair?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    3,511
    The difference is that if the optimised code is available (publically) to anyone that wants to use it, then that is fine.

    If I hack my own version just for my benefit, that is cheating.


    Just my opinions.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by Keith75
    From everything I have read about it the optimized version is fair and it is the regular version that is screwing you out of points since it doesn't take advantage of your chips features. Be like saying your car should drive with two flat tires in a race designed for motorcycles.
    It was explained to me that all it does is inflate your benchmark. It doesn't make any more use of your cpu, make it run faster, better, etc, than the regular version.

    If it did, as in using flags in F@H turns on SSE, better utilize your cpu, then I could see using it. But not if all it does is inflate your benchmark.

  9. #9
    NeoGen's Avatar
    NeoGen is offline AMD Users Alchemist Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Little Rock, AR (USA)
    Posts
    8,451
    But the optimized client does just that what you said.
    Check Crunch3r's page of optimized boinc clients. It has boinc versions with SSE and SSE2 enabled.

    http://www.guntec.de/Crunch3r/boincx86.html

    Seeing that the client doesn't actually do the work, then the end result for the user is an inflated benchmark, so by saying, but the benchmark values are much more in accordance to our machine's real capabilities.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    87
    Wait til you guys see the claimed credits coming in on Linux machines (mine included) and that they are using "optimized" Windows machines as part of the quorum of 2, in Simap.

    I'm waiting for the crying to begin.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •