Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Quad-cores demo this year???

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    NeoGen's Avatar
    NeoGen is offline AMD Users Alchemist Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Little Rock, AR (USA)
    Posts
    8,451

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    2,229
    You can bet that they will be pricey devils...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,945
    Wow.... Imagine running different DC projects at once. *drool* Those cpus will cost not only an arm and a leg, maybe both arms/legs.

    I could be playing a game and crunching on 3 projects at once.

  4. #4
    They'd better hurry up before we crawl the whole of the Web

    I don't think they will be that expensive, certainly not after 6 months after release - the thing about CPUs is that they hit limit in terms of frequency so the only way to improve performance is to have more cores - its simpler to do as well. Given that manufacturing processes improve and that AMD manages to sell dual core x2 3800 at 90nm for cheap price (211 GBP here in the UK now), it follows that the price for quad cores should not be more than 100% higher.

    Most likely dual cores will be relegated to current single cores cheap prices and quad cores will be charged premium similarly like dual cores now

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville, NC, USA
    Posts
    448
    I thought they already had quad-core servers etleast.
    Isn't </u>this</u> one?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Montgomery, IL, USA
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by AMD-USR_JL
    I thought they already had quad-core servers etleast.
    Isn't </u>this</u> one?
    No that is a computer with two seperate dual-core cpus. The quad cores will have 4 cores (duh!) on one physical CPU.

  7. #7
    NeoGen's Avatar
    NeoGen is offline AMD Users Alchemist Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Little Rock, AR (USA)
    Posts
    8,451
    So that's a dual-dual machine...

    Would be about the same performance as a quad though... :roll:

  8. #8
    NeoGen's Avatar
    NeoGen is offline AMD Users Alchemist Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Little Rock, AR (USA)
    Posts
    8,451
    Say... isn't there a hard limit on the number of cpu's that Windows XP will support? Given that multiple cores are identified as multiple cpu's, I wonder if quad-cores will force us to go over to server OS'es... :?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by NeoGen
    Say... isn't there a hard limit on the number of cpu's that Windows XP will support?
    Microsoft has got good stance on multi-cores - they consider them as one CPU for licensing purposes, not sure its implemented in XP, but it will certainly be in Vista

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    2,229
    Quote Originally Posted by Majestic-12
    Microsoft has got good stance on multi-cores - they consider them as one CPU for licensing purposes, not sure its implemented in XP, but it will certainly be in Vista
    Yeah..... anything to try and force the people to move to the next O/S

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •