Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 55

Thread: Optimized BOINC Clients FAQ

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nooksack, WA
    Posts
    650
    http://calbe.dw70.de/

    here are the latest clients from Crunch3r's clients I believe

    I am going to try out the 5.9.0.32 one...

    Edit:
    OK here is the difference on my lappy:

    Before:
    Memory702.48 MB Cache976.56 KB Swap space1622.95 MB Total disk space74.53 GB Free Disk Space16.23 GB Measured floating point speed1313.43 million ops/sec Measured integer speed2508.88 million ops/sec Average upload rate5.83 KB/sec Average download rate44.3 KB/sec Average turnaround time0.2 days Maximum daily WU quota per CPU100/day

    After:
    Memory702.48 MB Cache1953.13 KB Swap space1622.95 MB Total disk space74.53 GB Free Disk Space16.18 GB Measured floating point speed3394.89 million ops/sec Measured integer speed7239.11 million ops/sec Average upload rate5.83 KB/sec Average download rate44.3 KB/sec Average turnaround time0.2 days Maximum daily WU quota per CPU100/day
    Last edited by PcManiac; 02-25-2007 at 10:00 PM. Reason: update
    If you can't make it ... Don't come!
    http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2007/race4b.htm


  2. #42
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,945
    Tried them a while ago on NanoHive. Doesn't like it. It finishes WUs in minutes when it's supposed to be finished in hours.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    991
    Will this work on normal PCs?

    I want to use it on ym Windows box bcause looking around, my 3500+ was being beaten by a 2800+ Semperon!

    Mine
    Semperon

    Obviously if it reports wrong results I dont want it.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville, NC, USA
    Posts
    448
    Crunch3r's boinc won't make you crunch any faster than normal, it will just inflate your benchmarks, making you request more credit per WU.

    If you want to crunch faster though, Akosf made some optimized apps for SIMAP somewhere in this thread.
    http://boinc.bio.wzw.tum.de/boincsim...ighlight=akosf

    I'm not sure if they still work or if they have gotten integrated into the offical SIMAP app, but you can try it. Just make sure to make a backup of your BOINC directory before doing anything.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    991
    I was being beaten by benchmarks. I know I cant crucnh faster.

    Yes the appilication in SIMAP did take on board his optimiseastions.

    Currently running the truxcroft client now actually.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville, NC, USA
    Posts
    448
    Try Crunch3r's then. Just look at how much higher my 2.6 GHZ P4 is than your 3500+.
    http://boinc.bio.wzw.tum.de/boincsim...p?hostid=66311 When you install crunch3r's it should be even higher than that.

    I had problems with Crunch3r's 5.9.0.32, i think it's a developmental build. The stable version has worked perfectly though.
    http://calbe.dw70.de/boinc/5.8.11.32...s_intelx86.zip

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    991
    Ah I'm fine with the Truxcroft for the minute. ;)

    I installed that and whilst not technically optimised, it got doubled my integer speed. (but my floating points remained similiar)

    I'll leave this going foer a bit, see what happens, and then try the cruncher one

    EDIT: Just noticed the Cruncher one can return result immdiatly as well..I'll give it a whirl now

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    991
    Double post BUT the crunchers client was awful!

    Ran it twice and got:
    01/05/2007 23:37:23 3779 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
    01/05/2007 23:37:23 2018 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU

    01/05/2007 23:35:25 3752 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
    01/05/2007 23:35:25 1998 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
    Running the Truxcroft client, I get
    01/05/2007 23:40:43 7347 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
    01/05/2007 23:40:43 2150 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU

    I'll stick with the Truxcroft core.
    http://boinc.truxoft.com/

  9. #49
    apple1 Guest

    Hello!

    HELLO!
    thanks,it's very clear.I like this.
    thanks

  10. #50
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Cebu,Philippines
    Posts
    90
    How you find that core, is it stable?

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •