Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Unable to attach to Rosetta

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    129
    Probably slow becuase of the mass exodus of SETI refugees looking for new projects.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,945
    I've been looking through posts on the SETI forum. How and why did people accuse Crunch3r of cheating?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Louisa,Virginia
    Posts
    612
    I haven't been able to figure that out either...with some of the long term crunchers droping out for various reasons, especially Paul Buck I don't see why I should return to Seti myself.They will really have to change their attitude before I return..... :cry:

    Tony Kaye, Billy Sherwood, Alan White, Jimmy Haun


    Amd Users StatsJoin World Community Grid


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    534
    SETI is a pointless project anyway... life on other planets? Who gives a crap? We can't even live on earth without killing each other so knowing there is other life out there isn't really going to make much difference.

    I have crunched about 1 WU for SETI and 1 WU for SETI beta, i plan not to do anymore workunits even if it's for a competition.... it's just a waste of CPU.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    171
    My take on it all is that Seti has been trying to level out the playing field, especially in respect of Linux, which has been under claiming on all projects for a long time. The anti optimised clients bandwagon jumped on it and claimed that these clients were in fact cheats. There were then allegations that certain processors and operating systems were favoured by the regular code and the optimised clients levelled the playing field. Things got complicated when it was pointed out that the optimised clients used things like SSE2 to increase their scores whilst many of the projects did not use them, everything then got very nasty with claims that some of Crunch3R’s credits had reached 60 for one WU. The sad thing is that many of these optimised clients/apps streamlined the code and actually made the WUs run faster leading to more science per host. The truth was, as usual, the first casualty. dAVE

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville, NC, USA
    Posts
    448
    Before you start crunching on rosetta, you guys should think about muon1 (DPAD). That's where Free-DC is beasting us the most at the DC-vault. I've only ran a couple hours so far. If any of you have upgraded to the newer boinc and can't disable the network activity to get a big cache, then think about running DPAD a little.

    To join our team, run the gui. When it asks for your name type "[AMD Users]Your Name". Also you might want to go into config.txt and change the auto-send to yes.

    Happy DPADing. :D

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville, NC, USA
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by dAVE
    My take on it all is that Seti has been trying to level out the playing field, especially in respect of Linux, which has been under claiming on all projects for a long time. The anti optimised clients bandwagon jumped on it and claimed that these clients were in fact cheats. There were then allegations that certain processors and operating systems were favoured by the regular code and the optimised clients levelled the playing field. Things got complicated when it was pointed out that the optimised clients used things like SSE2 to increase their scores whilst many of the projects did not use them, everything then got very nasty with claims that some of Crunch3R’s credits had reached 60 for one WU. The sad thing is that many of these optimised clients/apps streamlined the code and actually made the WUs run faster leading to more science per host. The truth was, as usual, the first casualty. dAVE
    Sorry made a new page over an important post

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville, NC, USA
    Posts
    448
    Look here that 181 pts is all me baby! :D

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •