Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 1st Impressions of Vista BETA 2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,945

    1st Impressions of Vista BETA 2

    So, after a long install (and long driver installations)... I finally get into vista.

    My 1st impressions, looks cool. A bit much on the eye candy. I don't like the new explorer, I preferred the old version w/ the full specific name of the folder I'm in (ie: C:\Documents and Settings) rather than "Computer -> VISTA L:\ -> )

    Control Panel's a bit annoying, too many clicks just to get to one spot. I mean, why did they have to seperate each tab for customizing your own desktop? Very annoying IMO.

    And the best part being admin of Vista? Being denied permission to folders. :evil: Application Data to be exact, I can't seem to get into it even though I'm administrator.

    I'll be trying it more, but so far w/ the ATI drivers install, everything runs much more smoothly (animations not jerky, etc.).

    So far, it has potential, but this is my 1st hour w/ Vista and I'm sure it'll imrprove. So far, I rather stick with XP. Only reason I want Vista is so I can use DX10 w/ the game Crysis.

    My 1st impressions rating: 6/10

  2. #2
    NeoGen's Avatar
    NeoGen is offline AMD Users Alchemist Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Little Rock, AR (USA)
    Posts
    8,451

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,945
    No, DX10 (D3D [Direct3D] to be more specific) is Vista exclusive.

    In order to use it, we are forced to upgrade to Vista. But as I said, I don't think I'll be getting it the moment it comes out. It'll take me a while to get used to the whole new user interface.

    I wonder how many updates it'll be needing in less than a year. :roll:

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Louisiana, USA
    Posts
    33
    wow, no DX10 without a upgrade? that sucks.
    In wildness is the preservation of the world, so seek the Wolf in thyself...



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    991
    lol...

    Could have added it to here :p

    http://www.amdusers.com/modules.php?...ewtopic&t=2717

    Anyhow...

    the default way of doing the computers section in Explorer is easy to go back...just click to the left and it'll give you the full path ;) Tis easy to navigate with the new section though...

    Application data? not tried it.

    Though an annoying think is the protection on the windows drive. (ie C:\)
    Vista blocks any sharing of the folders. It can be got around I'm told in a long a diffcult way.

    Any folders you want to share either have to be in C:\Users\Public or on a seperate drive D:\ for example. That annoied me slightly as it meant I had to move my Folding@home folfder to D, just so I can share over a network and monitor on another PC.

    Other than that, a nice OS IMHO

  6. #6
    It's Windows Biger, slower, and thay moved every thing around so harder it use. Yep, like normal Mirosoft. But thats what keeps us admin's working.

    I do like the "Computer's Performance Rating" But it's hard on Graphics. Time to buy a new GPU. My 6600GT is a 5.9 but the cards 128m of ram is a 3.2
    If pro is opposite of con, then what is the opposite of progress?
    Congress!



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,945
    Just noticed BOINC works perfect fine on Vista (on my XP partition, made another for Vista). Guess I can stick w/ Vista for a while. Though I'll be going back to XP for my games, HL2 has graphical corruption due to DX10.

    EDIT: Even MS' default games suffer from graphic corruption! Boy do they need to fix DX10 fast.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    991
    Here's a list of current compatible VIsta games as noted by me...

    UT (Original GOTY editio)
    UT2K4
    Battelfield 2

    :D

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,734
    regarding the vista compatable games/apps.

    I assume they run faster and are better due to the greater amounts of memory allowed etc.
    But on a same spec machine on any of those games could you tell the difference between which platform they were being run from when in game (XP or Vista)? Is it noticably faster?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    991
    Wouldn't say they were faster noticably.

    But they recognise they aren't being installed on a recognised OS for them but they install and work anyhow

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •