thanks for the update dave.
i think i will be sticking to boinc optimised for the moment then, which is SSE or SSE2 (or even SSE3) compliant.
thanks for the update dave.
i think i will be sticking to boinc optimised for the moment then, which is SSE or SSE2 (or even SSE3) compliant.
Gee.... another reason to stay away from boinc.... social computing engineering.
Although the 5.5.0 version I am using now shows much higher benchmark speeds I notice that I get almost exactly the same credit for a set amount of time as I did before with the standard client. :?
That depends on the project... Riesel Sieve Boinc and some others have already adopted a fixed credit value system, so optimized clients don't get more credits than regular ones.
2009 MULTI CORES CONTEST STATS
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2009/contestoverall.htm
CHRISTMAS QUEST CONTEST STATS
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2008/xmascontest.htm
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2008/stats.png (snapshot)
FEBRUARY '08 RACE STATS
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2008/racefeb08b.htm
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2008/racefeb08nb.htm
I see. I guess Spinhenge has also done that. I am actually in a strange way glad they did. I like a level playing field.
So What would the best clients be for a AMD 64 bit processor namely the 3500+ and 4000+?
Before BOINC: 8778 Seti WUs Crunched
check you e-mail murray.