Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Compare AMD and Intel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sundsvall, Sweden
    Posts
    3,532

    Compare AMD and Intel

    A comparison between my AMD Athlon 3200+ and Intel Dual Core 2 E 6600 as is very interesting from CPU-z.

    Name: AMD Newcastle
    Technology: 0,13 um
    Volt: 1500w
    Core speed: 2370 MHz (normal 2,200)
    Buss speed: 215 MHz
    Hyper Transport: 1077 MHz
    Memory frequency: 169 MHz
    Max bandwidth: DDR PC 3200 (200 MHz)
    Manufacture: Unknown. Perhaps Wiking or Kingston
    Support: MMX+, 3DNOW+, SSE, SSE2 and x86-64
    Crunch a Riesel Sieve task around 47,30 on average. (Optimised Client).

    Name: Intel Conroe
    Technology: 0,65 nm
    Volt: 1208w
    Core speed: 2,395 MHz
    Buss speed: 266 MHz
    Front Side Bus; 1064 MHz
    Memory frequency: 399 MHz
    Max bandwidth: DDR2 PC2-6400 (400 MHz)
    Manufacture: Corsair
    Support: MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSSE3, EMT64T
    Run 2 Riesel Sieve tasks at around 47,25 on average ( No optimised client) Five % increase of time should be 2.36 minutes

    The AMD is yet as fast as Intel running RS and claimed more points for each WU. Despite Intel crunch one more tasks it gets 3-4 points lesser than AMD yet. But if I should run a non optimised client on the Athlon I guess it should be equal.
    Once an AMDuser always an AMD user

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sundsvall, Sweden
    Posts
    3,532
    The Athlon has a ABIt MOBO as support 400 MHc memory but I have only 200 MHz. I think if should I buy 2 512 MB DDR DIMM PC 3200 400 MHz memory it should speed up the computer. I think Corsair twin is a good memory but expansive. Kingston has twin matched memorys as is mych cheaper but got good recensations. The memorys I have now is different and cause interuptions if I try use "Turbo setting" to overclock it. What do you guy think?
    Once an AMDuser always an AMD user

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    26
    Corsair is better.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nuneaton, UK
    Posts
    880
    I can highly recommend OCZ Gold



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In a cornfield about 35 miles east of St. Louis
    Posts
    1,508
    I have some cheap mem that I bought from Newegg that does well to around 250 to 260. It was only $70 a gig and it's advertised to only be used on AMD products. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820161679 In my 4800+ I have 2 gig of Corsair that are a matched pair. I haven't gotten to take it as far as it will go yet. I am still waiting on a return for my cooler. Newegg shipped me the one for an Intel instead of the AMD.
    Me transmitte sursum, caledoni!

    I am totally against political jokes....I've seem to many of them elected!!



  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    129
    I'm guessing your board is Socket 754, you'll be wasting your money buying matched sticks of ram, 754 boards are single channel memory bus only.

    you have the right speed of ram, PC3200 is 400Mhz(2 x 200) the 200 is one direction only.

    I see your memory multiplier in the bios is wrong, your ram is running at 338Mhz (2 x169),set memory clock frequency to 1:1 (or DDR 400 or PC3200 depending on or bios) some boards don't AUTO detect 400Mhz ram properly sometimes.

    depending on the quality of ram they should be able to handle an overclock to 10% without problems

    if it boots up, your ram speed should be 215 in CPU-Z with your 7.5% overclock or 430Mhz.

    if it doesn't boot up, set your FSB clock back to 200
    after it is stable again you can try overclocking again

    if you decide to buy new ram, one stick of PC4000(500Mhz) 1Gig will better handle your overclock.

    Cheers
    Big Whiskey

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sundsvall, Sweden
    Posts
    3,532
    Here is some more information about the memory on the Athlon.

    Yes the Motherboard is a socket 754 Chipset: VIA KT800 PRO, Southbridge VIA VT 8237

    The Athlon has 2 memorys at 512 MB each in 2 slots.

    General

    Type: DDR
    Channels: Single
    Size: 1024 Mbytes.

    Timings

    Frequency: 169,1 MHz
    Front side bus: DRAM CPU/14
    CAS Latency: 2,5 clocks
    RAS to CAS Delay 3 clocks
    RAS Precharge: 3 clocks
    Cycle Time: 7 clocks
    Bank Cycle Time: 10 clocks
    Command Rate: 1T
    Dram Idle Timer: 16 clocks

    Memory

    Slot 1
    Frequency 200 MHz
    CAS Latency: 2,5
    RAS to CAS: 3
    RAS Prescharge: 3
    TRAS: 8

    Slot 2

    Frequency 133 MHz
    CAS Latency: 2
    RAS to CAS: 3
    RAS Prescharge: 3
    TRAS: 6

    Frequency 166 MHz
    CAS Latency: 2,5
    RAS to CAS: 3
    RAS Prescharge: 3
    TRAS: 7

    Frequency 200 MHz
    CAS Latency: 3
    RAS to CAS: 4
    RAS Prescharge: 4
    TRAS: 8

    As you can notice slot 1 has 200 MHz and 2,5, 3, 3, 8 as multiplier.
    Slot 2 has 3 different speed and 2, 3, 3, 6. and 2,5, 3, 3, 7 and 3, 4, 4, 8. Isn’t that strange? I think the memory in slot 2 should be equal to slot 1 as the memory is in my Intel
    Once an AMDuser always an AMD user

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by Lagu View Post
    Here is some more information about the memory on the Athlon.

    Yes the Motherboard is a socket 754 Chipset: VIA KT800 PRO, Southbridge VIA VT 8237

    The Athlon has 2 memorys at 512 MB each in 2 slots.

    General

    Type: DDR
    Channels: Single
    Size: 1024 Mbytes.

    Timings

    Frequency: 169,1 MHz
    Front side bus: DRAM CPU/14
    CAS Latency: 2,5 clocks
    RAS to CAS Delay 3 clocks
    RAS Precharge: 3 clocks
    Cycle Time: 7 clocks
    Bank Cycle Time: 10 clocks
    Command Rate: 1T
    Dram Idle Timer: 16 clocks

    Memory

    Slot 1
    Frequency 200 MHz
    CAS Latency: 2,5
    RAS to CAS: 3
    RAS Prescharge: 3
    TRAS: 8

    Slot 2

    Frequency 133 MHz
    CAS Latency: 2
    RAS to CAS: 3
    RAS Prescharge: 3
    TRAS: 6

    Frequency 166 MHz
    CAS Latency: 2,5
    RAS to CAS: 3
    RAS Prescharge: 3
    TRAS: 7

    Frequency 200 MHz
    CAS Latency: 3
    RAS to CAS: 4
    RAS Prescharge: 4
    TRAS: 8

    As you can notice slot 1 has 200 MHz and 2,5, 3, 3, 8 as multiplier.
    Slot 2 has 3 different speed and 2, 3, 3, 6. and 2,5, 3, 3, 7 and 3, 4, 4, 8. Isn’t that strange? I think the memory in slot 2 should be equal to slot 1 as the memory is in my Intel
    To answer your last question first: why the different timings between sticks 1 and 2?
    Different manufucture- different recipe

    As to multiple speeds listed thats normal, it's to let the bios know at XXXmhz run these timings, the strange part is there is only one listed for the first slot.

    Your bios is probably set for auto detecting ram
    The bios found a set of timings that match between the two sticks of memory
    slot#1- 2.5, 3, 3, 8 @200
    slot#2- 2.5, 3, 3, 7 @166
    but it had to use the lower speed

    You have three options:
    1) Let it run as is
    2) Adjust your Bios(possiblality of lower or losing overclock)if you try this and if don't like the results you can set it back to where it was
    3) Buy newer ram,a stick of 1Gig of PC3200 or PC4000 or 2 of 512(you don't have to buy packaged matched sticks, as long as they have the same timings preferably same manufacturer

    If you want to change your bios
    Advanced Chipset=> DRAM Configuration
    change DRAM Timing Selectable from By SPD to Manual
    now you can change DRAM Clock from DDR333 to DDR400

    try to reboot and see what happen

    you might have 1 of 2 promblems or both when you reboot
    first- your overclocked FSB may over power the ram- just set it back to 200
    second- it may not find the second stick of ram because the timings don't match for 200, if this happens then you will have change the timings in the bios to match the speeds slot 2 @ 200 - 3, 4, 4, 8
    CAS Latency Time 3
    RAS# to CAS# Delay 4
    RAS# Precharge Time 4
    Row Cycle Time 8

    once it's stable then you can try overclocking again
    Hope this helps
    Big Whiskey

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sundsvall, Sweden
    Posts
    3,532
    Thanks Big Whiskey

    The computer has run stable since I bought it. The only as happens is when I try to overclock it to Turbo settings and the computer shouted down. I´m satisfied how it is now. Play with the bios is not my strongest side. But perhaps I will try it lather. I was only wondering if the momory was wrong but I now know it has with the bios to do. Perhaps some upgrade of the bios will help perhaps not.
    Althoug all works fine so far.
    Once an AMDuser always an AMD user

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    388
    very disappointed that you ran an optimised with the AMD cpu and a non-optimised with the Intel chip. when i run Boinc Seti optimised, it is at least twice as fast as the non-optimised, (using the same computer).



    basically this comparison doesn't tell me a whole lot.
    Last edited by NVM; 11-18-2006 at 09:57 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •