Ok guys, it is refreshing when we can talk to each other in a silent and sensible manner! We have our right have our own option and let us respect each other.

I have as you all know bought an Intel Core 2 Duo E660 because I wanted a cruncher and because I can run whatever I want. For example Seventeen or Bust is made for Intel even if AMD can run it. There are a few math-projects as is fitted for Intel.

Right now I run Riesel Sieve helping Vaughan and both my AMD Athlon 3200+ and the Intel is running their WU’s at 46-48 minutes. But AMD claim more points but instead Intel run 2 WU´s at the same time. I can say, my AMD is a great machine as I not will underestimate. It is doing better than Intel’s PIII and P 4 in most I guess 85 of all projects out there.

It will be quite interesting see whish ace AMD will have in its shirt arm. But I think we not have seen the end of the technical development yet. However peoples want the most powerful processors today. We may not forgot the fact peoples use their computers not only for crunching also private for various reason and that can play a role for their choose of make.

I have 2 Intel’s and 2 AMD’s. The oldest from Intel is a 440EX/PIIX4E from 1999 is running at 350 MHz, has 6 GB 4,000 rpm disc and 128 MB RAM. I have no heart put it in a wardrobe because it can still run Moneybee without complains. Of course it isn’t so fast but 4 tasks per day and night is she able to finish. Many small brooks form a large river as we use to say. And it needs no babysitting.

If you guys will we can say I’m a half AMDuser and a half INTEluser but in my heart I’m a real AMD supporter at 100%. Inte means NO on Swedish.