Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 66

Thread: New client for GPU

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    917
    If the GPUs are indeed performing significantly more work for F@H than CPUs then I think more credit should be awarded. It shouldn't be significantly more, but it should be enough to encourage people to invest in the newer techniques - so that F@H can accomplish more science in the same amount of time.

    Not providing enhanced credit would be counter-productive and would provide no incentive for most crunchers to make the investment.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    969
    Well I've done 3 Wu's and now have 715 points awarded on my ati 1900. How does that compare to running 3 wu's in a windoze or linux client point wize?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    991
    Point wise depends.

    How long did they take? I estimate a CPU client (standard) would be doing about 110 points a day...or more precisely thats Standford's benchmark machine. Therefore 6 or 7 days.

    Also depends on the WU's. I have had 3600+ points in 3 work units before but those were 7 day moster's on linux that took about 1 hr 30mins per frame..

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    969
    Hi Drezha,
    The first wu completed real quick, then the second 2 took over a day each, probably somewhere around 12-15 hours.

    btw: is there a way to tell after the wu's have been turned in to tell how much time was spent on each wu after the fact ?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    991
    http://home.comcast.net/~wxdude2/rph/fah.html

    Those may help.
    I use FAHChart, FAHMon, EM3 and UDMon to monitor a few.

    Currently using UDmon and FAHChart on my laptop and FAHMon on my main rig...Used EM3 before. Third party apps but they can tell you afterwards yes, if you enable logging. I personally like FAHChart for completed unit info. Very nice.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    969
    cool, I'll give your suggested favorite a whirl. thanks.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Louisa,Virginia
    Posts
    612
    Hi ALL, Just a note on my F@H GPU client. I bought a ATI X1950 XGE for AGP, and so far I am crunching two wu's a day for 660 points per day. Is anyone else getting the same or better results ?? It seems to average 2.0 sec. per frame, where my X1600 pro was 5.2 sec. per frame and completed a wu every 1.5 days...quite an improvement with the new card !!!

    Tony Kaye, Billy Sherwood, Alan White, Jimmy Haun


    Amd Users StatsJoin World Community Grid


  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    2,229
    And what did the card set you back? And what AGP version? Can any of them be purchased that will work on the old socket A motherboards?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Louisa,Virginia
    Posts
    612
    Brucifer, Unfortunately the X1950 was $280 on Ebay, I think it retails for around 300 if I'm not mistaken. It is AGP 8X, and I am running it on a Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe MB, which is socket A.I think as long as it is 8X your fine, but this is a VisonTek card so you may want to check their web site for more info. Which is here http://www.visiontek.com/products/ca...50pro_AGP.html
    To run F@H on it you need special drivers too
    http://support.ati.com/ics/support/d...estionID=23354
    good luck !!!
    Last edited by BlackAdder; 12-17-2006 at 01:28 PM.

    Tony Kaye, Billy Sherwood, Alan White, Jimmy Haun


    Amd Users StatsJoin World Community Grid


  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    418
    Anyone still running the GPU client? Is it running good or bad ?

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •