That's okay, we're kicking butt right now anyway ...Too Bad intel fellows, ha ha ha
Senior Member
That's okay, we're kicking butt right now anyway ...Too Bad intel fellows, ha ha ha
Senior Member
Intel is coming out with a Native Quad Core in a few months.
Senior Member
I bet that's going to be expensive...
Senior Member
It sounds to me like AMD may be able to get back into the lead with top of the line processors by Summer of '07.
Senior Member
Now THAT would be awesome!Originally Posted by Keith75
I think it would be fun to try setting up a dual dual-core setup, and run sume benchmarks ... it would make a nice little home server (to replace my 2.7ghz celeron...)
Wait, I just had a thought! what about when you put 4x quad core cpus on one board!!! 14 cores?! wowzerz!
AMD Users Alchemist
Moderator
16...
2009 MULTI CORES CONTEST STATS
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2009/contestoverall.htm
CHRISTMAS QUEST CONTEST STATS
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2008/xmascontest.htm
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2008/stats.png (snapshot)
FEBRUARY '08 RACE STATS
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2008/racefeb08b.htm
http://neogen.amdusers.com/contest2008/racefeb08nb.htm
Motivator & Enthusiast
Moderator
New math lesson, 4 x 4 equals 14 in pCManiac's point of view, NeoGen believes it equals 16, I think if you combine the GPU processing cabailities included you could potentially run upto 4 more Graphics Cards for a system. This brings the total to about 20, for an original design of 4 quad cores on one board? Where else could we isolate a processing power on one board? Anyone! Why stop here, there has got to be some designing innovations ready to adapt our thought of processing even more stuff!
Challenge me, or correct me, but don't ask me to die quietly.
…Pursuit is always hard, capturing is really not the focus, it’s the hunt ...
Senior Member
Sounds like system bloat to me.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
