Quote Originally Posted by Keith75
Hey BC, when I was running at the faster FSB and it was giving me the error I had the memory timing at 2T. I only changed it to 1T after turning it back down to 204 FSB. So far after 3 days it hasn't puked on me or given me any errors.

Keith

Ok... so running at 204 FSB, you can get away with a 1-tick command delay.

the previous FSB speed was too much for 2T (it must have been a 3 or 4T need then... something was wacko.... or is the BIOS backwards??? )


May I suggest that once you are certain you are stable ... write down your settings... and then just switch to 2T at 204. See if that runs ok. It better, otherwise you have a hardware problem and need warranty replacement.

Once 204-2T is stable (2T because you have AT LEAST CL2) start
stepping up 1 or 2 Mhz at a time... you better make it to 210-2T.

210 vs 200 = 5%... I'm sure your board is not THAT restrictive. Most
specs are +/- 10%... unless you require tight tolerances (like in power regulation which is +/- 3%).

If you can't get even 204 at 2T to work, I'ld get the warrantly replacement saying the board wont run stable at specs. All you have to say is you have a NewCastle instead of a Clawhammer core and their tech support folks will understand.

let me know please how it works out... I'm bigtime curious now.

BC.