I can't seem to find our team in the stats on the BOINC Seti project. I sorted by total WU completed and looked all the way from the #1 place down to teams with only 3,000 WU done and can't seem to find us.
Keith
I can't seem to find our team in the stats on the BOINC Seti project. I sorted by total WU completed and looked all the way from the #1 place down to teams with only 3,000 WU done and can't seem to find us.
Keith
Under the SETI forum, I noted that the Team idexing in SetiBoinc have been fixed. Yes. You have to drill a long way down to find us. Much further than 3000. But to save you the trouble, here it is again...
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team...p?teamid=31777
The splitters are slowly catching up with the demand for outgoing workunits (for the moment) but the servers are still grinding through a backlog of uploads so the ratings are dubious and will be for some time until the project starts to stablise over the next month or so.
Transitioning a project like SETI is not a minor undetaking. It will take time for them to bed down the BOINC feed to such a large membership. I was searching the team lists when I saw 1 team transition the other day with over 13 thousand users! (post edit: "Team Art Bell" in 20th place with 13069 members) Serious business.
You are 100% right... and to complicate matters... the database created for Boinc-Seti is FAR from optimal. There were 11 (at last count) indicies on the main database.... They have transitioned from CPU bound to I/O bound.... Someone needs to learn how to use the 'select()' statement better in the server code....Originally Posted by Dave
One lesson learned on predictor... and you will see this as we grow, there is already the hardware in place with a MUCH different db structure to handle the workload .... Part of that is visible in that we get many files are part of a snigle WU instead of the 'pre-zipped' WU files that Seti hands out.
Based on Dev & Alpha email traffic... it will be some time before the database gets restructured for large volume, proper hardware shiffted over, and the user base (the most time consuming and difficult part) to transition. Seti is changing almost daily... Predictor changes at a MUCH slower rate... I'm glad we are able to draw from the experience of Seti as in the end, I think we will probably be pulling over D2OL and a few other related projects... (that is *purely* my opinion though).
In the end, please be patient with Seti.... that huge array of machines gets moved a few hosts at a time... a huge undertaking during the summer months when the extra hands are not available to help out.
BC
The Seti Team position has not changed in over a week. I'm fed up waiting for the page http://gemini.setiatwork.com/cgi-bin...?id=316&type=0 to update.
Can anyone who reads this post a link that gives the team position please.
I'll take the best one.
http://stats.kwsn.net/team.php?proj=sah&teamid=31777
Looking there we are 569
and our credit is 82,263.53
Keith, it says seti classic, but it is seti boinc.
Nice try.
At least he tried........ Good grief....
I'm in a weird mood.......
Anyone watching Kermie doing that for a while will end up in a wierd mood
![]()
I keep looking for something new..... But I can't find anything that will measure up to Kermit......
I sent an email off to the setiatwork team to ask why the team position stats are not updated.
They replied quickly with :
So we'll just have to live with position 2929 for the moment.Hi Stuart
The problem is that the 370 pages I need to generate the stats are not
updated by Berkeley:
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/...eam_0_0_1.html
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/...eam_1_0_1.html
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/...eam_2_0_1.html
.
.
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/...eam_a_0_1.html
.
.
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/...eam_z_1_1.html
.
.
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/...eam_X_9_1.html
Same problem with country stats pages too ...
Thanks for the support!
Best regards
Jing Wee