Stats problem for RC5-72?

[Ototero]

I have us listed at position 671, as does the Dnet site, but Bok has us at 13.

I much prefer Bok's position but alas, I think it's wrong.

[NeoGen]

I think Bok does not list *all* the Dnet teams as it is just too many to bear. (tens of thousands)
So he keeps stats of a small set of known teams and makes the stats with those.

[AMDave]

NeoGen is correct.
Some of Bok's projects are a short-list, especially in the cases of FaH Seti@Home and Dnet where the enormity of the entire stats field is simply too large to be worthwhile.