Survey # 2

[Beerknurd]

Survey # 2


Here is a new survey with updated graphics. Please vote for your favorite.

#1

#2

#3

#4


Please make comments

[Beerknurd]

Does anybody care about these polls. Does everyone want to have their own???

[em99010pepe]

I voted for :-# :-# :-#.

[Ototero]

I created a dynamic graphic on the boinc.dk site 3 days ago. They have not posted it yet.

Also, their stats are out of date, they have me in pos 12 for predictor but I am in 8!

:cry: :cry: :cry:

[AMDave]

Beerknurd, of course we care !
Personally I think that branding is a very powerful thing although difficult to achieve unless there are some kind of standards or agreements.
I am going for #3.
#1 and #4 have readability issues.
#2 and #3 are strong on readability and clarity of the logo
the reason I am selecting #3 is that it is graphically stronger and differenciates itself from the "common" text on white.

May I say "nicely done" to the creator of all 4 of the options.
I had a go at a couple myself and it turned out crappy.

Good job

-- Dave --

[Ototero]

COMMON, COMMON, you calling my work COMMON? lol lol


Actually, the background of #2 is a gradation of green to white. It just doesn't show very well.

[Ototero]

[AMDave]

Stu, Stu, Stu.

Perhaps "regular" or "popular" would have been a better choice, but I think you know what I meant. Take a stroll through the Predictor and S@H forums and I think you will agree pretty quickly. I like the way your text is positioned around the images.

The logo I *failed* to create for Predictor stats was based on a folded protein image merged with our logo text. I wanted to get away from the planets & starts of S@H. I think my idea was good but my execution resulted in a cross face (mine) at 2:00am, and I had difficulty getting the text fields to position nicely, so I passed on it when I saw those in the survey today which CLEARLY outclass my artistic abilities.

I think that the logos above are fantastic, but I'd still like to see what it would look like if any of you artists were to form one more "Predictor" focussed?

--Dave--

[Beerknurd]

readability <--- is that a word??? LOL. Anyways.



^^^^^^^^ Agreed, very hard to read.




^^^^^^^^ Not hard to read.


See what I do to work with you people??? I just don't understand what's wrong with you guys. If I don't start getting some artistic respect, I'm going to take my Intel to another team. I'm serious. I'm not playing.
























How was that? I may not be an artistic genius. But I can act. Did anyone think I was serious..... Come on be honest. Damn i'm good!!!! LOL. At least I got 2 votes this time. Well 1 not counting mine!!!

[Ototero]

Dave, yes I knew what you meant ;) It was never a problem.

Why don't you post your idea here anyway. Lets see if any budding picassos can produce the image you had in mind.

If you're too ashamed :oops: then email it to me.


Stu