Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Mystery Jars

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Vermont, USA
    Posts
    1,379

    Mystery Jars

    In one container there are two black beads, in another two white beads, and in a third there are one black and one white bead.

    They are labelled appropriately BB, WW, and BW.

    Someone moved the labels in such a way that for each container the label doesn't show its contents.

    Can you determine the contents of all three containers by withdrawing one bead from one container only?



    I guess this is not really humor. It has a logical solution....

    Maybe we need a 'Brain Teaser' forum?
    Last edited by Bender10; 11-10-2007 at 01:59 AM.
    Logic is the art of being wrong with confidence.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Arlington, Texas
    Posts
    5,396
    It makes my head hurt just thinking about it...

  3. #3
    AMDave's Avatar
    AMDave is offline Seeker of the exit clause Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Deep in a while loop
    Posts
    9,658
    Yup.

    The BW label is now on a jar that either contains 2 black beads or 2 white beads.

    There are only two combinations that allow for the assertion to be true.

    BEADS: BB WW BW
    LABEL: BW BB WW
    or
    BEADS: BB WW BW
    LABEL: WW BW BB
    as any other combination of the labels would result in a jar still containing what the label says.

    So, whichever colour I pull out of the jar labeled BW means that is the colour of both the beads in that jar and the contents of the other two are logically defined.

    If I pull out a white bead then both beads in the jar are white.
    Thus the jar labeled WW contains the black beads and the jar labeled BB contains 1 white and 1 black bead.
    conversely:
    If I pull out a black bead then both beads in the jar are black.
    Thus the jar labeled BB contains the white beads and the jar labeled WW contains 1 white and 1 black bead.

    That was fun.
    Lets do it again.
    . . . . . ___
    . . . . . . .\___/\______
    . . . . . . . \__AMD___\\__
    ---------------------------------------------

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,196
    Are you feeling allright Dave?



  5. #5
    AMDave's Avatar
    AMDave is offline Seeker of the exit clause Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Deep in a while loop
    Posts
    9,658
    Yeah. About as good as a hand drawing of flowers in a frame on the wall or a chocolate souffle. Thanks for asking.
    Last edited by AMDave; 11-10-2007 at 12:55 PM.
    . . . . . ___
    . . . . . . .\___/\______
    . . . . . . . \__AMD___\\__
    ---------------------------------------------

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Arlington, Texas
    Posts
    5,396
    Dave, have you ever thought about some kind of therapy??

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    418
    Dave lost me on the first sentence....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    3,511
    Yes, Dave, that logic is impecable. It works.
    Darkness isn't there, but you can't see through it

  9. #9
    AMDave's Avatar
    AMDave is offline Seeker of the exit clause Moderator
    Site Admin
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Deep in a while loop
    Posts
    9,658
    Quote Originally Posted by Beerknurd View Post
    Dave, have you ever thought about some kind of therapy??
    Well I did once think about a kind of therapy, but apparently that is not legal anymore.
    Then I got married and now it is totally out of the question.
    . . . . . ___
    . . . . . . .\___/\______
    . . . . . . . \__AMD___\\__
    ---------------------------------------------

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •