Intels side of the story: http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11/...xtreme_qx9770/
AMDs side of the story: http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11/...eaves_its_web/
Lots of reading on both sides - may the best win the mighty cup!![]()
I found this news disturbing but, now we understand what there problem has been:
"Somehow, we couldn't help but think back to the P60 as Dave Everitt informed the audience that a processor bug had found its way into the early Phenom processor samples. The bug causes the system to freeze when a certain combination of instructions coincides with extraordinarily high traffic. This bug can only be reproduced in the lab but does not occur under normal, real-world conditions. It is still present in the 2.20 GHz and 2.30 GHz versions of the Phenom (9500 and 9600).
As a result of this bug, the 2.4 GHz version of the Phenom with the model number 9700 has been pushed back to January of 2008. When it comes out, that version will not contain the bug."
I found this news on the 8th page of the AMD article above.
On Page #19, I found the new AMD's Overdrive tool, used exclusively for overclocking - Way Cool
Last Page Quote:
AMD seems to have done its homework when the company set the price for its Phenom processors. The Phenom 9600 is about 13.5% slower than Intel's Q6600 in our benchmarks. On the other hand, its price is also 13.6% lower than that of its direct competitor. Thus, the two products offer practically the same performance for your money.