Here is the reply I got wuth the question at the bottom,
Hi Terry
Yes, that's right. Units are larger. 10x for complete test and 1.5x larger for periodical test. Periodical test contains now a new test for searching Near-Wieferich primes too (Near-Wieferich primes searched complete test in older version only). We searching up to 3500 bits, these are very big numbers. Your computer working with these primes in periodical test (this could be one from them --> an example with same length):
26721172299753698648008733688874471902306840823358 597088341
27797743759327300412004826000870672243398605543832 118917562
35892694079357597313190489333906751359733158986441 253885270
79848422229178351169800930123037045297713044379008 747836549
15233240440094832497376821116536189456459992366423 416553629
43483188549337445913933355920682476650487566619059 289307098
90758630052440501368325803009705417694810501860137 274231736
67871198969875252251866068171602217971914740366834 021388846
33972961840530276895097859208247915416033886935192 096144600
43723249843543366187723581896602545364980518960584 306197613
20320736211630488666622970807633761614117022812753 023239000
90048794981585028568204734833759731007459019004195 062787732
38936732887956312526124686378661093871176354878335 149535862
43836976521485025186368042830067813741160772776645 534347861
22886082849381500637654733361931395400973244596465 727956006
74297036812272757405460329222853535250424750665902 138794847
53329686414792752738166410820482450437792580827438 303648555
62928123221364961345627426178615606593951502259754 7
This is one number!
And there is easy and in practice very exacting calculation described here: http://www.elmath.org/index.php?id=display_topic&topic=4 (try to put this number to p variable).
One unit of periodical test contains about 40 000 tests and does it take any time.
Version 2.0 and bonus points, which can quickly your increase member's score, eliminate time difference and rates member's activity (using current version).
For our current work is important using version 2.0. New algorithms working with version 2.0 great and very quickly and getting us more results.
Thank you for your quickly reaction.
Thank You for your team...
Jan
You can be sure, version 2.0 is very efficient
Terry Bond napsal(a):
Hi Jan,
Am I wrong or have the run times for the work units gone way up. It seems the they were running in about 8 hours on this machine and that has now increased to more than 12 hours.
Terry Bond