nuclear power here in Athens. power draw from the grid not even on my list of concerns. unless you are referencing to a draw on the power supply. my power,water,sewer,trash,gas and availability fees for all (availability fees are Bull S) have never been more than $350. i guess i see how having a thread enabled for the purposes such as controlling a gpu is nice. as far as an end user experience multitasking burning wile encoding wile gaming wile downloading.In my opinion there is no comparison (in current architecture) to the responsiveness of and AMD CPU TO an Intell one. admitting there are a lot more things in play ram,video card, chipset and the users ability to optimism there system. I have said on more than one occasion if you give an Intel a single task and tell to have at it they do perform very very very well and that why large corporation use them for SINGLE threaded applications AMDs kick the crap out of Intel on Multiple threaded applications for a 4th of the price a good example is the bulldozer chip line when benched 1 thread against an i7 the Intel chip owns .....however i like to use my computer
its going to take a new generation of software engineers to take the time to write more multi threaded apps to get a fair comparison ....when the Athlon64 came out it took 3 years for Intel to catch up ((((OH SNAP Before i forget one time only i say a WU running that said running multicore )))) i dont remember the project is that a setting somewhere im not seeing or is it project specific or whats the deal???
one other thought ive noticed that the pile driver 8 way is really 4 dual core when you look at how the chip is laid out two cores each share one L2 and they count this as 8 threads. do intel chips have an L2 dedicated to each thread